Strategy - proof Partitioning ∗ Debasis Mishra
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider the problem of choosing a partition of a set of objects by a set of agents. The private information of each agent is a strict ordering over the set of partitions of the objects. A social choice function chooses a partition given the reported preferences of the agents. We impose a natural restriction on the allowable set of strict orderings over the set of partitions, which we call an intermediate domain. Our main result is a complete characterization of strategy-proof and tops-only social choice functions in the intermediate domain. We also show that a social choice function is strategy-proof and unanimous if and only if it is a meet social choice function. We are grateful to Shurojit Chatterji, Arunava Sen, Yves Sprumont, John Weymark, seminar participants at University of Caen, Indian Statistical Institute, and Singapore Management University for useful discussions and comments. Indian Statistical Institute University of Caen
منابع مشابه
Strategy-proof partitioning
We consider the problem of choosing a partition of a set of objects by a set of agents. The private information of each agent is a strict ordering over the set of partitions of the objects. A social choice function chooses a partition given the reported preferences of the agents. We impose a natural restriction on the allowable set of strict orderings over the set of partitions, which we call a...
متن کاملRoberts' Theorem with Neutrality: A Social Welfare Ordering Approach
We consider dominant strategy implementation in private values settings, when agents have multi-dimensional types, the set of alternatives is finite, monetary transfers are allowed, and agents have quasi-linear utilities. We show that any implementable and neutral social choice function must be a weighted welfare maximizer if the type space of every agent is an m-dimensional open interval, wher...
متن کاملSeparability and decomposition in mechanism design with transfers
In private values quasi-linear environment, we consider problems where allocation decisions along multiple components have to be made. Every agent has additively separable valuation over the components. We show that every neutral and dominant strategy implementable allocation rule in this problem is a neutral component affine maximizer, which assigns non-negative weight vectors to agents in eac...
متن کاملMinimum Cost Arborescences ∗ Bhaskar Dutta † Debasis Mishra
In this paper, we analyze the cost allocation problem when a group of agents or nodes have to be connected to a source, and where the cost matrix describing the cost of connecting each pair of agents is not necessarily symmetric, thus extending the well-studied problem of minimum cost spanning tree games, where the costs are assumed to be symmetric. The focus is on rules which satisfy axioms re...
متن کاملBalanced Ranking Mechanisms
In the private values single object auction model, we construct a satisfactory mechanism a symmetric, dominant strategy incentive compatible, and budget-balanced mechanism. Our mechanism allocates the object to the highest valued agent with more than 99% probability provided there are at least 14 agents. It is also ex-post individually rational. We show that our mechanism is optimal in a restri...
متن کامل